| 
  CAIN Web Service Meehan, Níall. (2003) 'How RTE censored its censorship'
 [CAIN_Home]
 [Key_Events]
[Key_Issues] 
[CONFLICT_BACKGROUND]
 MEDIA: 
[Menu] 
[Reading] 
[Summary]
[Background] 
[Chronology] 
[Main_Pages] 
[Resources] 
[Sources]
 
 Text: Níall Meehan ... Page Compiled: Martin Melaugh
 
 The following article has been contributed by the author Níall Meehan with the permission of the Sunday Business Post. The views expressed in this pamphlet do not necessarily reflect the views of the members of the CAIN Project. The CAIN Project would welcome other material which meets our guidelines for contributions.
 
 How RTE censored its censorshipBy Niall Meehan
 
Published in 'Sunday Business Post'Sunday 20 April 2003
 
 
[Article also available as a PDF File; 726kb]
 
  Ten years ago, I conducted a 
            two-week study in DCU's School of Communications on how often RTE 
            told its audience that it was censored under Section 31 of the 
            Broadcasting Act. 
 By coincidence, news of the existence of the Hume-Adams 
            document, a key starting point for the peaceprocess, broke theday 
            the study commenced. Had RTE told us it could not interview Gerry 
            Adams, my mini-thesis that RTE was censoring the existence of 
            censorship would have been up the spout.
 
 However, the first 
            day's news set the tone. Newsreader Bryan Dobson reported that John 
            Hume was unavailable for interview because he was in the US. What of 
            Adams? Was the audience told that although the other end of this 
            political double act was physically available, RTE could not 
            interview him either? No they were not. Adams remained a non-person 
            in a story named after him for two whole weeks. It was typical of 
            the RTE response to censorship, one that frequently left outsiders 
            gazing on in disbelief.
 
 That year, 1993, was a bad one for 
            RTE. In its eagerness to uphold the law, RTE broke it. On March 31, 
            the broadcaster was found by the Supreme Court to have been 
            operating an illegal system of self-censorship. Under cover of 
            Section 31 of the Broadcasting Act, RTE had systematically extended 
            the scope of the censorship order. It had prevented a Sinn Féin 
            member (now Sinn Féin councillor) Larry O'Toole from speaking about 
            a trade union dispute in which he was the spokesperson.
 
 After the High Court declared the practice illegal RTE 
            appealed to be re-censored and told the Supreme Court it would not 
            allow a Sinn Féin actor to advertise a bar of soap. The US Newspaper 
            Guild declared: "We are astonished that RTE, instead of welcoming 
            this liberal interpretation of an abhorrent censorship statute, is 
            asking the Irish Supreme Court for a greater restriction of its 
            free-speech rights."
 Blanket banRTE said that its blanket ban was an exercise of its 
            discretionary powers. Yet, when faced with precisely the same 
            dilemma, the BBC said that a Sinn Féin member could not be held to 
            be representing his or her party during every waking moment.Under 
            British censorship rules, Gerry Adams was broadcast speaking on 
            behalf of constituents. 
 Since the 1970s RTE had been ordered 
            to stop Sinn Féin and IRA representatives or spokespersons from 
            being broadcast. Section 31 permitted governments to issue an annual 
            censorship order. Loyalists were also banned, but by common 
            admission of ministers, Section 31 was aimed at Sinn Féin.
 
 The order issued by Fianna Fail minister Gerry Collins in 
            1971 led to the sacking of the RTE Authority and the jailing of jour 
            nalist Kevin O'Kelly over his refusal to name IRA chiefof staff Sean 
            Mac Stiofain as the voiceona tapedinterview. After Conor Cruise 
            O'Brien became Minister for Posts and Telegraphs in 1973, he accused 
            RTE of allowing a "spiritual occupation" by the IRA. A new 
            management regime was put in place. Those who would not toe the line 
            were sent to agriculture, children's and religious broadcasting.
 
 By 1976 the National Union of Journalists said that the 
            government line on "security" issues was not questioned by RTE.There 
            were major stories of local, national and arguably world 
            significance that RTE was afraid to touch. Allegations of British 
            involvement in the 1974 Dublin Monaghan bombings were left 
            unexamined. Miscarriages of justice affecting the Birmingham Six and 
            others were largely ignored.
 
 RTE sent its security 
            correspondent to the Sinn Féin Ard Fheis to report his impressions 
            over pictures of the gesticulations of Sinn Féin delegates. During 
            this brief yearly ritual RTE said that "ministerial restrictions" 
            affected coverage. A system of self-censorship was securely in place 
            at the conclusion of O'Brien's tenure as minister in 1977. 
            Subsequent governments left that system in place.
 
 This is 
            confirmed in a recent biography of President Mary McAleese (by Ray 
            Mac Manais, Clo lar-Chonnachta). McAleese was an RTE reporter dur 
            ing the IRA hunger strikes. Her biography recounts how the 
            unfortunate Forbes McFaul was roundly denounced as "a fucking 
            Provo", after he broadcast an objective account of the growth in 
            nationalist support for the hunger strikers.
 
 RTE's 
            day-to-day practice altered the spectrum of accepted opinion on the 
            North. The absence of a republican voice allowed the promotion of 
            the idea that the SDLP represented a form of nationalist extremism, 
            and that unionists were in the misunderstood middle of the political 
            continuum. John Hume was relentlessly attacked.
 
 In RTE, 
            imaginary Provos were seen everywhere. Teacher Eileen Flynn was 
            infamously and publicly sacked from her job in Wexford because she 
            was pregnant and unmarried. Hesitant and uncertain, she reluctantly 
            agreed to be interviewed by RTE, until management in-structed that 
            she be asked (on the basis that her partner was) if she was an SF 
            member. RTE banned an advertisement for a book of short stories by 
            GerryAdams and refused to allow him to be interviewed as the author 
            of a work of fiction.
 Ray Burke steps inIn 1988 an exhausted 
            RTE reporter, Jenny McGeever, recorded and later broadcast Martin 
            McGuinness, as the bodies of three unarmed IRA members shot by the 
            SAS in Gibraltar travelled over the border. Ray Burke was minister 
            at the time. For reasons now becoming apparent, he carried 
            ministerial responsibility for broadcasting around on his back as he 
            traipsed from department to department. Burke rang RTE to express 
            his seething rage and to assert that "the foundations of the state" 
            were shaking. McGeever was hauled before her boss and accused of 
            being "a member of the Repeal Section 31 Campaign" (even this was 
            suspect). She was sacked in the bid to shore up the foundations of 
            our brown envelope society. 
 Many accounts of those days in 
            RTE ascribe its failings to a take-over of RTE current affairs by 
            the Workers Party, whose hysterical anti-provoism for med the 
            backbone of RTE's system of self-censorship.
 
 However, this 
            is to miss the point. There was a peculiarly RTE alliance between 
            the systems of media control originally devised by the two Joes 
            (McCarthy and Stalin) at work. The conservative leaderships of the 
            Irish political establishment were happy to see the republican 
            viewpoint excluded, even if that meant the eventual if short-lived 
            emergence of the Workers Party. The attempt by the Workers Party to 
            control media coverage of the North was largely successful because 
            it was in tune with a conservative fear of the consequences of 
            permitting exposure of nationalist experience in the North. That 
            conservative attitude continued to affect coverage long after the 
            demise of Section 31 in January 1994 and of Workers Party influence. 
            It was also not confined to RTE.
 
 Epilogue: after Larry 
            O'Toole won his appeal, he became the first Sinn Féin member to be 
            knowingly interviewed by RTE in 20 years about how it felt to have 
            won his case. Ironically, he also became the last one banned some 
            eight months later, when RTE refused to allow him to be interviewed 
            on the same subject for an item in an RTE-Channel 4 co-production.
 
 As he had become a Sinn Féin candidate in an election some 
            five months off, RTE said he was now a Sinn Féin representative in 
            his every utterance.
 
 Minister Michael D Higgins put an end 
            to this farce, when he abolished the Section 31 Order. What RTE did 
            then is another story.
 
 Niall Meehan is Head of the 
            Journalism & Media faculty in Griffith College, Dublin.
   
 
 
 |